New Delhi, May 28 (Reporter) The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s orders directing the construction of a verandah outside Courtroom No 1 and the eco-friendly redevelopment of the kutcha parking area within the High Court premises. The apex court rejected objections raised by the Chandigarh administration, ruling that the proposed works do not violate UNESCO guidelines applicable to heritage sites. A bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, observed that the verandah’s design, aligned with those outside Courtrooms 2 to 9, is consistent with the architectural character of the High Court building and does not compromise its World Heritage Site status. “We find that the High Court’s directive for verandah construction is appropriate and in conformity with the existing design elements. It does not breach UNESCO heritage norms,” the Supreme Court held. The bench added that the Chandigarh administration may still seek ex post facto approval from concerned heritage authorities as a precautionary step. The Court also endorsed the High Court’s decisions dated February 7 and 21, 2025, which directed the placement of green paver blocks and tree plantations in the kutcha parking area. The goal, the Court said, is to maximize vehicle capacity, create shaded parking, and boost the site’s green cover. To ensure effective execution, the Court directed the High Court administration to consult landscaping experts and monitor the process through a designated committee. In a partial reprieve to the UT Administration, the Supreme Court stayed contempt proceedings initiated by the High Court on December 13, 2024, for 12 weeks. The move aims to give the administration sufficient time to comply with the High Court’s order dated November 29, 2024. The dispute originated from a 2023 PIL (public interest litigation), filed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s Secretary, seeking basic infrastructural upgrades to the court complex. In November 2024, the High Court directed the UT administration to begin constructing the verandah within two weeks, citing litigant inconvenience due to the Chief Justice’s Court being in a separate block prone to rain-related disruptions. The Chandigarh administration resisted compliance, pointing to the Capitol Complex’s status as a UNESCO World Heritage Site designed by architect Le Corbusier. It claimed the construction required international heritage approvals and stated it had reached out to the Archaeological Survey of India and the Chandigarh Heritage Conservation Committee. The Committee granted in-principle clearance but suggested consultation with Fondation Le Corbusier in Paris. The High Court, however, found the administration’s delay unjustified and issued a writ of mandamus on November 29, 2024, mandating immediate construction. When the administration failed to act, the Court initiated contempt proceedings and impleaded Chief Engineer C B Ojha. Challenging these orders, the Chandigarh administration approached the Supreme Court, which stayed the High Court’s directions on January 10, 2025. Meanwhile, due to increasing vehicular congestion, the High Court on February 7, 2025, ordered the development of the open parking area using green pavers and the plantation of 100–200 trees. The administration’s plea to recall this order was dismissed on February 21, with the High Court underscoring the need for sustainable development and resolution of the parking crisis. With Tuesday’s ruling, the Supreme Court has upheld all four High Court orders, paving the way for infrastructural improvements that are both functional and compliant with global heritage preservation norms...////...