New Delhi, May 15 (Reporter) One of the first constitutional challenges awaiting the newly sworn-in Chief Justice of India Justice DY Gavai is the presidential reference under Article 143(1) sent by President Droupadi Murmu. The reference seeks the Supreme Court’s authoritative opinion on whether it can prescribe time-bound deadlines for the President and Governors to grant or withhold assent to bills passed by state legislatures. The matter gains significance in the wake of increasing tensions between state governments and Raj Bhavans over prolonged delays in clearing legislative proposals. The Supreme Court’s intervention is now being sought to determine whether such delays can be curtailed through judicially imposed timelines particularly using the court’s inherent powers under Article 142. The reference is also seen as a response from the executive to a recent verdict delivered by a two-judge bench led by Justice J.B. Pardiwala, which suggested timelines for gubernatorial decisions. Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar had voiced sharp criticism against judicial attempts to fix timelines for constitutional authorities, setting the stage for this high-stakes legal confrontation. The Supreme Court is now constitutionally obligated to deliberate on 14 questions raised by the President. These include the permissible scope of judicial oversight over the discretionary powers of the President and Governors, especially under Articles 200 and 201 of the Constitution, and whether Article 142 allows the Court to direct constitutional functionaries on timelines. CJI Gavai is expected to constitute a Constitution bench comprising at least five judges to examine the matter and deliver an advisory opinion which, while not binding, carries significant constitutional weight. The Supreme Court is poised to navigate uncharted territory, where judicial interpretation may reshape the delicate balance of federalism and executive discretion in India's democratic framework...////...